Sitemap | Links | Монгол хуудас   
Home
Management
Right to Know: Freedom of Information
Introduction
Media Specialized Lawyers, 1999
Newspapers in Education: Getting Started, 1999
Media and Corruption, round table,1999
Media legal Reform, 2000
Media and Women, 2001
Gender School for journalists, 2002
Freedom of Expression and Defamation, 2003
Public's Right to Know and Public Broadcasting, 2003
Democratic Elections and Media, 2004

Free and Fair ( Temporary Press Jury, Ethical Principles on Election Coverage), 2004

Media for Transparent Governance, (new) 2004-2005

Media monitoring (new) 2005

President election , (new) 2005

Freedom of Information
News
Media laws
Publications
Contacts
 

INDEPENDENT MEDIA

Democratic Elections and Media

EVVALUATION SURVEY REPORT
CONDUCTED AMONG THE PUBLIC AND JOURNALISTS


PREFACE
More than 10 years have been passed since free press has became a reality in Mongolia. During this period the Mongolian journalists experienced 4 democratic elections of the Parliament.

The present survey was conducted by Globe International, a Mongolian NGO in the framework of project " Democratic elections and media", which was financially supported by UNESCO. It was aimed at testing public opinion how Mongolian media was balanced and fair during the Parliamentrain Elections held in June 27, 2004 and exposing challenges and difficulties that Mongolian journalists face in covering elections.

Survey involved 500 citizens aged above 18 and 200 journalists working in the news and current affairs from 30 media outlets, which represent app. 10% of working journalists.

Media freedom is one of fundamental prinicples of democracy and an essential part of human rights. So the public opinion on media actions should be the main reference document for mass media in fulfilment of their duties to be public watchdog.

We deeply express our many thanks to UNESCO in running the project and conducting this survey.

H.Naranjargal, project leader

I. PUBLIC OPINION

1.1. FRAME

There are many things that affect the results of election campaign and voting but media plays the main role. It is important that media disseminate balanced, objective and fair election information. That is why media should be independent from any political parties, coalition or movement acting professionally and serve the only public interest. Media has duty to fairly assist the voters in exercising thier right to know accessing impartial and balanced information on activities of all parts involved to the elections. It depends how media is professional and ethical during the elections.

Questionaires distributed to 500 citizens residing in Ulaanbaatar city, where the most of media outlets are concertrated.

Table 1. Age categories

Survey involved all the age categories and their educational background shows sufficient social representation

Table 2. Education

Status
QTY
%
1. Secondary school
37
7.4
2. High school
153
30.6
3. High
222
44.4
4. Other
88
17.6
 
500
100%

1.2. HOW DID MEDIA WORK DURING THE ELECTIONS?

Broadcasting is the most effective and influencial media. Waves they use are public property and there is always limited access. According to international standards broadcast media must serve the public providing fair and balanced information on election campaign. Private print media is permitted to announce their preferences. 86% of respondents said that they received election information from media and 14% from other sources such as billboards, promotional fliers and etc. 91.4 % of those used TV.

Table 3.
Information received by the public

Type of media outlet
QTY
%
1. TV
457
91.4
2. Radio
99
19.8
3. Newspaper
266
53.2
4. Magazine
10
2
5. Other
70
14

To question " Was the information sufficient to make your choice?" 51.2% said it was not sufficient and 48. 4% think it was sufficient. 0.4% respondents did not reply. Those, who considered the information was not sufficient, explained what kind of information they wanted in the following ways:

Table 4. The most wanted information

Type of information
QTY
%
1. Debates of candidates
162
63.3
2. Analytical programs and articles
106
41.4
3. Information devoted to voters' education
42
17.2
4. Other
23
8.9

1.3. HOW FAIR DID ACT MONGOLIAN MEDIA?

67.8% respondents insist that Mongolian media could not act fairly enough during the elections. 17.4% think media was fair and 14.8 % said they did not have any ideas. From 335 persons, who focused on unfairness, 73.4% consider media served one party.

Table 5. Unfairness occured

How unfairness occured
QTY
%
1. Served one party
246
73.4%
2. Information is not balanced
194
57.9%
3. Journalists called citizens to vote for certain candidate
124
37%
4. Journalists expressed their own opinions
77
15.4%
5. Did not distinguish paid and unpaid advertising
74
22%
6. Did not metion information sources
67
20%

92.5% of respondents said unfaireness occured on TV and 15.2% of respondents said radio was not fair. Others metion newspapers. Respondents were asked to name the most unfair television channel and results are below.

Table 6. TV channels covered elections unfairly

TV channels
%
1. Mongolian National TV
75.1
2. TV 9
39.5
3. TV 5
34.8
4. UBS
17.5
5. Channel 25
10.5
6. All channels
6

 

All contents © copyright 2004 Globe International NGO. All rights reserved.
®Designed & Developed by Bodicom LLC 2004.
Ages
QTY
%
1. 18-25
112
4
2. 26-30
123
24.6
3. 31-35
113
22.6
4. 36-40
74
14.8
5. Above 41
78
15.6
 
500
100%